(some) “Rules” to Live by (or personal philosophy, or redundant stuff (most) everybody may have already thought of and said/done before)

Some stuff I do, and/or at least generally try to do.

Don’t be making rules for, or be telling others, how to run/lead their lives. Exception: rather to quite (explicitly) solicited advice/feedback/opinion – offer suggestions, etc., but stated as personal opinion/perspective, suggestion(s), and not as absolute(s).

Actions speak louder than words. Doing it (generally) counts much more than writing it. Writing it typically counts for more than saying it. If it’s neither done, written, nor said, it generally counts for rather to quite little, or even nothing. Intents matter – but only so much – if/when they matter at all.

Not doing, is a type of doing – always choice(s).

Don’t be afraid to think it out. Sometime (much) better results in doing – or not doing, or how (not) done, are, or may, thus be achieved. But don’t (or try not to) over-think it. There is a point of diminishing returns. Optimal point is short of point of diminishing returns. Don’t be afraid to sometimes (have to) act very fast. Not everything affords time to “think”. Sometimes it must be (not) done “instantly”, or close to it. Can’t always know what’s best first or ahead of time – deal with it, live with it, accept it, accept responsibility for what’s (not) done.

Walk the talk. Be consistent, do what one says and espouses. Do not be a hypocrite! That which is past was not always correct. Accept responsibility. Do not resist change just because it’s how it was done or has always been done or how it was done before. Make it better – at least as reasonably feasible and appropriate.

Most things done, could have been done better. Often useful to review, to learn from such, and improve for present and future. However, can be (rather/quite) counter-productive to (excessively) pick over flaws and flaws past and/or “display” them. It’s (mostly) a matter of what’s approached/examined, how, with what attitude(s), how it’s “displayed” (if at all), etc.

Be relatively humble, and not particularly boastful. Do it well – good, excellent, great, friggin’ fantastic even … but don’t make a big deal of having done it. Set the expectation “it really just ought’a be done that way … or better … always … or at least nearly so”. And just do it, and meet or exceed expectations. “It”, should be shown/demonstrated as the way to do it – by doing it – again, don’t make a big deal of it, just do it and set/raise the expectation in so doing.

Perhaps/rather it’s just/quite me personally, but I’m rather/quite the fan of just doing it (very) well/right, and “the right thing”, no matter how significant, and (often) do it (even very) quietly – even anonymously. Just do it – no one need even know that it was done, or who did it, or there be any recognition or acknowledgement, or even knowledge of the act or that it was done – just simply do it!

“Lead by example” – set/improve standards in setting the example by doing it. Hypocrisy in such areas is particularly deleterious and tends to, e.g., feed cynicism, demotivate and demoralize, etc. There exist many examples of “what” to do, … and likewise what not to do. Some examples of what not to do:


  • Espouse honesty, make it a crime to lie to law enforcement, have law enforcement lie “in the name of catching criminals”.

  • Espouse fiscal responsibility, while being anything but.

  • Espouse fidelity, while philandering

  • much etc.

Nobody’s perfect. Don’t expect too much. Do expect “enough”, or at least that. There are effects, such as (psychological) self-fulfilling prophecy. Folks (also applies to self) tend to do, make, act, etc., into and towards what is expected of them – be it explicit, stated, implied/implicit, and/or even subtly and/or “subconsciously” / non-verbally “communicated” – even if not intentionally. Be aware of expectations set, and communicated or the like – intentionally and even unintentionally so.

Do not try to be perfect! Do not “demand” or expect perfection of or from others. Homo sapiens are not perfect. Expecting/”demanding” perfection, etc., results in repeated, and often significant, disappointment, demotivation, etc., and generally significantly less than otherwise optimally achievable results. Set expectations at/around more achievable targets, and net results will be better than aiming/expecting (far) too high or “perfect”.

Do not think of oneself as “at all” above average. You’re not, really, … at least in most all regards, anyway.

Absolute bare minimum requirement: Be a better (morally/ethically) human than average – compared at any given time, across all of humanity, and not just by a wee bit, but at least a quite significantly and “indisputable”, at least statistically significant, bit. Now, if only all of humanity were to quite do that at the same time always – or at least try very earnestly for that – or at least as close as feasible, humanity would very quickly shape into something a whole lot nicer and better.

Aim fairly high, but not too high. Specifically, work to optimize the most good one can net/feasibly do … with due care and attention and recognition of the constraint that one remains human – and inherently imperfect. As feasible, work in consideration with those flaws, limitations, and uniquely human, and personal, characteristics, etc., rather than against them.

Do not be a doormat, a pushover, a gullible sap, sucker, etc. Being good/nice/helpful etc., is one thing. Being something that effectively “trains” bullies, abusers, scammers, etc. to do more of that is doubly not a good thing, as it both tends to foster/encourage their bad behavior, and it generally tends to tear down and weaken self – which generally then has negative impacts beyond just self. This, however, does not mean one shouldn’t, or should never, go way the friggin’ heck out of one’s way, or really stretch – long, far, hard, perhaps even often to help or render aid, etc. Be useful/helpful, etc. (Try to) Know the difference between being useful – and being used. One may not always know in advance, or even during. Some things may only be known after – or sometimes may not even become known at all. Deal with it.

Try. (Generally) Better to have tried, and failed, than not tried at all.

Fairly useful rule-of-thumb: When unsure or in doubt – think of best possible example of person one can imagine, or similar in one’s place, and think of how they would handle it, react to it, deal with it, what they would/wouldn’t do, etc. That’s typically the right choice. One can figure out why that’s the right choice later … if one’s ever able to figure it out, anyway. Many choices are not clear-cut. Sometime the only choice is among unacceptable options; such sucks, but in such cases, one or more available choices will at least be the least unacceptable … choose it, deal with it, suck it up.

Suck it up, but don’t bottle it up. Mostly bit about being human. Don’t allow (in particular negative) emotions to fester. Work ’em out. Work ’em out in beneficial – or at least non-destructive/non-harmful way(s).

Anger sucks. Don’t do it. Don’t act or act out in anger. Me – at least mostly – quickly convert/dissipate/”use” (but not abuse or act in anger) it, don’t abuse it … any bits of anger, I mostly, highly typically and quickly convert: anger –> frustration –> energy –> do something good/useful with it. Processed it that way, so long, so many years, it’s quite ingrained “habit” … dang near happens “automagically” most all the time without my hardly even giving it a second thought. … “Anger? He doesn’t do anger. What’s he like when he gets angry/mad? Doesn’t happen, … never seen it. I don’t know, why don’t you ask him?”

Perspective. One never really knows/understands the perspective of another. You’re just never there – haven’t been, will not be, etc. Might partially know/understand, but you’re not them and they’re not you, so even if one thinks/believes one’s experienced quite the same, etc., it’s still not the same – as one didn’t experience it as them, and thus can never really know their experience of it. E.g. one has not experienced their full life history, biology, genetics, chemistry, physics, etc., and thus can never truly and completely know their experience of it or how they perceive it. Recognize and be aware of that. A.k.a. I’ve really got no clue what it’s like for them or how they are or have experienced it, even if I think I do … well, okay, maybe a (very) rough approximate idea, at best … but also quite probable I may be off – or way off-base, in my presumptions/guestimations/estimations of how they experience(d) and perceive(d) whatever. Listen. Observe. As feasible, work more so with evidence and fact, less on presumption, speculation, or guesses. Sometimes one will quite have to guess anyway. Try to at least realize how incredibly wrong one’s guesses may be. When one’s not guessing, one may still be (way) off. Accept it, deal with it, work with it, use, but don’t abuse, that knowledge/ambiguity/(un)certainty.

Do not presume. Sure, sometimes one might “need” to guess, but, often one’s presumptions (and guesses) can be way the friggin’ heck off. Know that.

I am not a saint, nor anything particularly close, nor claiming to be such nor even interested in claiming or “pretending” to be such. I am “average”, after all, … or at least pretty darn close to it – not a big deal.

Shouldn’t kids be “taught”, or at least introduced, to pretty much all this, and long before they’re even adults? Maybe. Who knows. Perhaps they already are … at least in some way(s).

Golden Rule – is kind’a sucky and needs appropriate refinement (replacement!). I much prefer it be replaced with the:
Platinum Rule – do unto others as they want to be done unto (and don’t do unto them as they don’t want to be done unto).
Inherently serious flaw in Golden Rule is a presumption that everyone wants/needs, at least approximately, the same thing(s), etc., when that really just isn’t the case, hence Golden Rule is far too simplistic, and thus significantly flawed. “Of course”, full proper version of Platinum Rule would also detail limitations/exceptions, etc. It can’t be usefully and reasonably applied as stated above with zero additional modifications, exceptions, or constraints.

Maybe I “ought” to stick this up somewhere (more) publicly/attributed? … or … not. Maybe even less so? After all, does it really matter who “said”/wrote it? More so, just that it was said. And besides, I’m not (that) “special”. “Average” (at least approximately) after all anyway. And given the billions on the planet, not to mention all those before, it’s probably already been said/written already many times before, perhaps too, even to the point where this really is pretty much to be expected, and absolutely nothing “new”, exciting, unknown, etc., or that hasn’t already been quite (well) covered before elsewhere by (many) others.

Don’t forget to laugh, especially at self – and life, and with others, but not at others.

For lack of better descriptor, could call this “my” personal philosophy … though no reason at all to presume or assume that it is at all uniquely “mine”. Probably (hopefully?) a whole friggin’ lot more highly similar, if not (quite) identical already exists out there. Maybe I simply just redescribed the wheel, and failed to properly credit earlier discoverers of same.

And when all’s said and done, it is.

Advertisements

Tags: , , , , , , ,

Leave a Reply

Fill in your details below or click an icon to log in:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s


%d bloggers like this: